« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Best Practise with R09  (Read 1386 times)

Miles

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
  • And lo, it came to pass ...
    • Just Flickr
Best Practise with R09
« on: June 04, 2011, 10:21:55 AM »
Hi, I ran out of the Aculux Leon gave me  ;D And the Infosol that I got from my local shop and found myself in Waterloo yesterday.  I popped into Silverprint and bought 500ml of R09.

Now ... The Massive Dev Chart seems to differ from what the bottle says with regards to times and processes ...

What are the waters top tips, I have a roll of the cheap AFX we al got from Photographica that I've shot in an old Welta Weltix I've just got working, mostly urban test shots and I like high contrast ...


Ideas ?

« Last Edit: June 04, 2011, 01:00:17 PM by Miles »
Logged

Thom Stone

  • Peel Apart
  • ***
  • Posts: 398
    • With The Cold
Re: Best Practise with R09
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2011, 01:01:44 PM »
I have just started using R09 and I devd a roll of apx from photographica in it going by the massive dev chart and felt the shots were quite underdeveloped. I then dev'd a roll of fp4 from my Rb67 going by the bottle times and was much happier with the results. Was pretty disappointed in the MDC tbh :-p however don't take my word for it. I'm sure some more experienced R09 users will give you more advice
Logged

LT

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,030
Re: Best Practise with R09
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2011, 01:07:13 PM »
are you chaps only scanning the results?  I've found the MDC times seem to work well if you are planning to print from the negs - bu bear in mind they are just user submitted results.  What works for one printing process wont necessarily be great for another. 
Logged
L.

Thom Stone

  • Peel Apart
  • ***
  • Posts: 398
    • With The Cold
Re: Best Practise with R09
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2011, 01:10:06 PM »
P.s. I think the mdc times seem to be for lower contrast. If you like higher contrast I would go for bottle times. But that's just from my very limited experience as I said 
Logged

Thom Stone

  • Peel Apart
  • ***
  • Posts: 398
    • With The Cold
Re: Best Practise with R09
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2011, 01:11:27 PM »
Yeah I haven't printed from these negs yet, just scanned.
Logged

Miles

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 783
  • And lo, it came to pass ...
    • Just Flickr
Re: Best Practise with R09
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2011, 01:13:34 PM »

Cheers All.

Will look about, never done "stand dev" either fo might try that.
Logged

Terry

  • Guest
Re: Best Practise with R09
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2011, 09:48:39 PM »
Don't know the stock you're shooting, but I've found that stand developing Tri-X in the R09 gives a lot of grain and pretty high contrast.  (1:100 for one hour)
Logged

jojonas~

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,928
  • back at 63° 49′ 32″ N
    • jojonas @ flickr
Re: Best Practise with R09
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2011, 01:35:42 PM »
on stand developing; I mostly took a half stand on 1:50 for half an hour, agitating a bit at start, middle and end. worked good enough for me on a bunch of different films. :)

Quote from: Terry on June 04, 2011, 09:48:39 PM
Don't know the stock you're shooting, but I've found that stand developing Tri-X in the R09 gives a lot of grain and pretty high contrast.  (1:100 for one hour)
interesting. I'm no fan of kodak bw films but I'm gonna try some next week in caffenol.

Logged
/jonas
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »