Author Topic: This might sound like a barmy idea but.....  (Read 1294 times)

Late Developer

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,033
    • My Website
This might sound like a barmy idea but.....
« on: October 04, 2010, 09:11:40 PM »
.....I've been wondering, of late, whether it would be best to put the 35mm negatives I want to scan into anti-Newton slide mounts and then use the slide carrier on my Epson V750 to scan them.

My logic (insofar as I do logic) goes like this:

1. So long as the negative is clean when it goes into the mount, it will stay clean. If I do manage to get finger marks or dust on the glass, I can wipe them off with a microfibre cloth easily.

2. Because of 1. I only have to worry about keeping the glass lenses / beds on the scanner clean (a real bug-bear for me as I use our rather dusty second bedroom as my makeshift office / digital darkroom).

Has anyone else done / considered doing this? Is it a good idea or am I a brick short of a hod-load?

Your thoughts / advice, please....
"An ounce of perception. A pound of obscure".

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,758
Re: This might sound like a barmy idea but.....
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2010, 10:28:37 PM »
Well... it would beep everything neat and tidy. If you don't plan on doing enlarger work, it's a simple viable solution.

I've once seen someone who used some anti-reflection pictureframe glass with sanded edges that he had mounted on 4 small silicon feet. He used masking tape to hold the negatives in place while scanning...

But I figure the slides are probably the safest way to keep negs...
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

Late Developer

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,033
    • My Website
Re: This might sound like a barmy idea but.....
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2010, 12:59:50 AM »
Thank goodness for that. I had started to believe a career in window licking was on the cards.....
"An ounce of perception. A pound of obscure".

Pete_R

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,148
    • Contax 139 Resource
Re: This might sound like a barmy idea but.....
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2010, 06:04:02 PM »
Sounds a good idea but the only occasion I ever used glass slide mounts, the slides were damaged from fungus. I suppose there was some dampness in them somehow and that encouraged the mould to grow. So using them to scan might be a good idea but I'm not so sure about long term storage.

Just did a quick search on the subject and found this discussion. Sounds like glass can be OK but you have to be very carefull about cleanliness and dryness of the mounts. I obviously wasn't.
"I've been loading films into spirals for so many years I can almost do it with my eyes shut."

Late Developer

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,033
    • My Website
Re: This might sound like a barmy idea but.....
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2010, 07:35:50 PM »
Thanks Peter, the Photo.net thread was very useful.

I'm a bit paranoid about ensuring slides are dry before mounting under glass as I had a couple of nasty experiences when I first started using slide film. I hated the cheap and nasty Kodachrome cardboard mounts with their fuzzy edges, so I used to transfer my "keepers" into GePe anti-newtons. My old house didn't have double glazing or central heating and, unbeknown to me, was perpetually slightly damp. The inevitable happened and, like you, I learned the hard way.

Where we live now is as warm and dry as King Tut's sandals - so no fear about storage. In any event, I'll be scanning the negs to very large TIFF files so, if the worst happens, I'll still have a very usable image. Not the same as a negative but still worth having.

Regards, Paul.
"An ounce of perception. A pound of obscure".

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,758
Re: This might sound like a barmy idea but.....
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2010, 10:19:14 PM »
If you're really paranoid about loosing the images to fungus growth, you can always have them irradiated after they're mounted  ;D

But for the reassuring thought, I've had my grandpa's old glass mounted slides (Leica mounts, no Anti-Newton glass, just a thicker cardboard spacer on both sides) in the basement (which is somewhat dry I should add) and have had no fungus problem. If it's damp, you might want to consider a can of desiccant like Silica Gel.
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

Late Developer

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,033
    • My Website
Re: This might sound like a barmy idea but.....
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2010, 01:30:08 PM »
Cheers Francois, good idea.

I have a small collection of silica gel sachets (collected over the years) so I'll definitely keep a few in the box with the slides.
"An ounce of perception. A pound of obscure".

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,758
Re: This might sound like a barmy idea but.....
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2010, 03:33:28 PM »
Since silica gel absorbs humidity, so if the packets are somewhat old, you might need to re-activate them.
Here's something on the subject
http://www.theruststore.com/Silica-Gel-FAQ-W40C2.aspx
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.