« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: is this against the rules?  (Read 2147 times)

Ken B: eyes, I just do eyes.

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 491
  • In email, no one can hear you scream
is this against the rules?
« on: July 06, 2012, 01:16:11 PM »
Logged
Age can weary me when it can keep the hell up

http://www.kensphotoblog2013.com/

http://www.artybollocks.com/

LT

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,030
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2012, 01:27:48 PM »
c'mon Ken.  Play the game.  ::)
Logged
L.

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,765
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2012, 02:05:16 PM »
A lilac colored lens ???
Yuck!
 ;)
Logged
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

DS

  • Peel Apart
  • ***
  • Posts: 332
  • I don't look like my avatar
    • Waffle blag
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2012, 03:13:00 PM »
I suppose it's just a Nikon F mount so could be used on a film body- but then you might as well use a holga, eh?
Logged

DS

  • Peel Apart
  • ***
  • Posts: 332
  • I don't look like my avatar
    • Waffle blag
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2012, 03:51:15 PM »
Also, look at the back of it- is that some kind of weird zone-plate oddity to make it more holga-y on a small film gate? Otherwise I imagine it'd be fairly sharp and dull if you were just using a tiny portion of the lens coverage.
Logged

gary m

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 452
  • Listen to the picture
    • Gary Moyer
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2012, 03:55:44 PM »
They are definately set up for digi cams. Here are few shots with a Canon Rebel film body. http://cgmoyer.blogspot.com/search/label/hlc
Logged

sapata

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,079
  • "I want to be plastic" Andy Warhol
    • Personal Site
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2012, 04:16:57 PM »
I have my Russian Helios lens mounted on my DSLR,  I kind of feel less guilty...
Logged
Mauricio Sapata
@mauriciosapata
mauriciosapata.com

Jack Johnson

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 667
    • Me on Flickr
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2012, 05:27:51 PM »
I was gifted one that I use on my Nikon FG body occasionally and the length is just too long, I think. It's never crappy or wide enough.

(Cue Diana Mini, which is often too crappy.)

I've been tempted to borrow someone's fisheye adapter and see if that helps, but as DS said, I should really just buy a Holga.

EDIT: Just out of curiosity, has anyone tried the Diana lens adapters on a film SLR?
« Last Edit: July 06, 2012, 06:09:46 PM by Jack Johnson »
Logged

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,765
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2012, 10:07:49 PM »
Quote from: DS on July 06, 2012, 03:51:15 PM
Also, look at the back of it- is that some kind of weird zone-plate oddity to make it more holga-y on a small film gate? Otherwise I imagine it'd be fairly sharp and dull if you were just using a tiny portion of the lens coverage.
It does look an awful lot like the aperture plate on the Rodenstock Imagon portrait lens
Logged
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

jojonas~

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,928
  • back at 63° 49′ 32″ N
    • jojonas @ flickr
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2012, 11:20:26 PM »
huh.. seems to give an interesting flower-like pattern on the shots.
Logged
/jonas

Ed Wenn

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,300
  • Slowly getting back into it. Sometimes.
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #10 on: July 07, 2012, 01:29:22 AM »
"* camera is not included." Good  ;)
Logged

DS

  • Peel Apart
  • ***
  • Posts: 332
  • I don't look like my avatar
    • Waffle blag
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2012, 01:57:13 AM »
Quote from: Francois on July 06, 2012, 10:07:49 PM
Quote from: DS on July 06, 2012, 03:51:15 PM
Also, look at the back of it- is that some kind of weird zone-plate oddity to make it more holga-y on a small film gate? Otherwise I imagine it'd be fairly sharp and dull if you were just using a tiny portion of the lens coverage.
It does look an awful lot like the aperture plate on the Rodenstock Imagon portrait lens
Quite. This'll be right up your street:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/homemadelens/discuss/72157623873502868/?search=imagon
Logged

jojonas~

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,928
  • back at 63° 49′ 32″ N
    • jojonas @ flickr
Re: is this against the rules?
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2012, 10:00:22 AM »
DS. that is a rather impressive thread! o_O interesting how different looks you can get~
Logged
/jonas
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »