Filmwasters
Which Board? => Main Forum => : original_ann September 23, 2010, 12:42:17 PM
-
tp://www.vimeo.com/10902902
-
Nice idea. well put together. i can't imagine the sheer amount of film they must have used.
when they say they shot 35mm film in a 16mm movie camera it means the frames were 16x24 ? half-frame ?
-
It's an interesting idea, I did some movies on super 8 once. I have a Bolex 16mm but the cost of film and processing is too much.
16mm is smaller than half frame 35mm (movie standard) I think from memory it was 10mmx7mm or there about.
During my early phographic career I processed 16mm for the BBC, if anyone is interested here is a snap or two of the processor:
(http://www.pbase.com/mark_antony/image/115029616.jpg)
(http://www.pbase.com/mark_antony/image/115211972.jpg)
Back in 1984.... :o
Mark
-
;D ;D ;D
Film Infrastructure !
;D ;D ;D
-
Nice idea. well put together. i can't imagine the sheer amount of film they must have used.
when they say they shot 35mm film in a 16mm movie camera it means the frames were 16x24 ? half-frame ?
I just figured it out...
The images are all shot on a 35mm camera. Then the prints are sequenced and animated using the 16mm cine. Then everything is transferred to the computer using a telecine machine.
The 16mm camera can't handle the width of a 35mm spool.
Must have taken hours to do... fan-tastic.