Author Topic: And now, it's the Weekend Thread! - 7-9 Apr 2017 (Read 11173 times)

02Pilot · « **on:** April 07, 2017, 01:34:17 PM »

Not enough for a proper photo essay, but I'll kick off the weekend with several photos from a lovely little hike I took last week. All with Canon P and either Canon 35/1.8 or 100/3.5, on HP5+ in Caffenol C-H(RS):

Fluminian · « **Reply #1 on:** April 07, 2017, 01:43:48 PM »

Nice shots, Andrej.

Fuji GA 645 Zi, Fomapan 100, Rodinal.

lone_chair by Miljenko Vrankovic, on Flickr

calbisu · « **Reply #2 on:** April 07, 2017, 02:04:33 PM »

Great start, liking both the nature and urban shots

Lets put some little people...

Contax G1 45mm planar Kodak TriX by calbisu, on Flickr

SLVR · « **Reply #3 on:** April 07, 2017, 03:34:13 PM »

a 6x9 shot from me at iso 12,800!

Indofunk · « **Reply #4 on:** April 07, 2017, 03:40:28 PM »

Wow! How did you get that much detail at 12800?? Film and dev scheme pls.

jharr · « **Reply #5 on:** April 07, 2017, 03:49:50 PM »

A shot of an unusually cloudless sunset. This time of year is normally cool and cloudy in the evening.

Graflex Speed Graphic
Graflex Optar 135mm
Kodak Internegative film @ iso 5
f/22 x 2 sec.
Unicolor C-41 development

Miramar Sunset by James Harr, on Flickr

SLVR · « **Reply #6 on:** April 07, 2017, 04:00:33 PM »

Quote from: Indofunk on April 07, 2017, 03:40:28 PM

Wow! How did you get that much detail at 12800?? Film and dev scheme pls.

Video to come

Bryan · « **Reply #7 on:** April 07, 2017, 04:02:48 PM »

Andrej, I like that whole set, very nice. SLVR, that's amazing, can't wait for the video!

These were both shot in Crow Agency, Montana with an Olympus OM-2n Using a Zuiko MC Autozoom f/4 35-70mm lens. The film is Fujifilm Superia X-TRA 400.

Casino Church by Bryan Chernick, on Flickr

Snowblind Snowcats by Bryan Chernick, on Flickr

Kai-san · « **Reply #8 on:** April 07, 2017, 04:30:07 PM »

Lomo 135BC / Adox CHS 100 II in Xtol.

Gimenosaiz · « **Reply #9 on:** April 07, 2017, 05:06:06 PM »

Hi!

I also love my SP ;-)
I tested my Zorki 1-D and the Industar 22 ... but I forgot what film I was shooting. I developed with Rodinal (stand) ... it was HP5. Not the best combination, hehe.

1.

2.

3.

My girls!

Nice weekend ;-)

Cheers!

Francois · « **Reply #10 on:** April 07, 2017, 08:57:22 PM »

Quote from: SLVR on April 07, 2017, 03:34:13 PM

a 6x9 shot from me at iso 12,800!

Is she wearing a head lamp?

SLVR · « **Reply #11 on:** April 07, 2017, 08:58:26 PM »

no its a weird aberration. Its on the film but wasn't there when I shot it. It's not a flare though

Pete_R · « **Reply #12 on:** April 07, 2017, 09:32:01 PM »

Quote from: SLVR on April 07, 2017, 08:58:26 PM

no its a weird aberration. Its on the film but wasn't there when I shot it. It's not a flare though

Looks like a static discharge.

Pete_R · « **Reply #13 on:** April 07, 2017, 09:34:59 PM »

Westminster bridge.

Indofunk · « **Reply #14 on:** April 07, 2017, 09:47:04 PM »

Quote from: SLVR on April 07, 2017, 08:58:26 PM

no its a weird aberration. Its on the film but wasn't there when I shot it. It's not a flare though

It's her root chakra, which only shows up at ISO12800

Klaus · « **Reply #15 on:** April 07, 2017, 10:30:53 PM »

Almost done with scanning my first EFKE25 film - Nikon F60 - Yellow Y2 Film - Ilfosol3
1- Wycombe Technical School (until 1958)
2- Last of the ruin shots - manipulated during scan

Francois · « **Reply #16 on:** April 07, 2017, 11:10:24 PM »

Quote from: PeterR on April 07, 2017, 09:32:01 PM

Quote from: SLVR on April 07, 2017, 08:58:26 PM
no its a weird aberration. Its on the film but wasn't there when I shot it. It's not a flare though

Looks like a static discharge.

Definitely does when you look closely.
Call it serendipity! Could have happened anywhere else on the frame.

hookstrapped · « **Reply #17 on:** April 08, 2017, 01:05:00 AM »

Another gif with Fuji FP100C

chris667 · « **Reply #18 on:** April 08, 2017, 06:19:18 AM »

Beautiful work, everyone.

KevinAllan · « **Reply #19 on:** April 08, 2017, 07:10:20 AM »

A Dutch tram awaiting restoration at the North East Land, Sea, and Air Museum:

astrobeck · « **Reply #20 on:** April 08, 2017, 07:36:02 AM »

Vivitar Ultra Wide and Slim with Tri-x
from a recent trek to Texas

MiguelCampano · « **Reply #21 on:** April 08, 2017, 01:45:50 PM »

A Couple from Wednesday, trying to finish up a roll of HP5+. Developed with Ilfosol 3, 1:14 for 9 minutes. Canon 650, Canon EF 50mm 1.8 II

Have a good weekend, everyone!

Hot Seat by Miguel Campano, on Flickr

Goose by Miguel Campano, on Flickr

irv_b · « **Reply #22 on:** April 08, 2017, 06:05:04 PM »

Another fantastic weekend thread by all concernened
Mine are from my recent trip Barbados trip I'll put some underwater shots on an essay soon
Fuji superia 400 OM1n lab developed

Klaus · « **Reply #23 on:** April 08, 2017, 06:47:12 PM »

My last scan of the weekend - going travelling for work ....
Couple of daffodil pictures, not very sharp (due to constant brise), taken with Bronica ETRsi, handheld, on Kodak Ektar 100, plus one fence post. Interesting effect on the first one, taken against the tarmac of the road, created an interesting blue colour - tarmac is of course mid to dark grey. As comparison a shot against green grass. Fence post was just to fill the last frame, interesting texture, just a bit of darkening of the highlights.

Indofunk · « **Reply #24 on:** April 08, 2017, 07:38:25 PM »

I love Irv's sunsets!

Mine's a bit pedestrian this week, but I was a pedestrian while taking it, so I guess it's ok

Also a bit of a test, I shot Kodak Gold at 800, and instead of developing it normally or pushing a stop in C41, I threw it in with a roll of Gold I shot at 1600 (the speed I normally shoot Gold), and pushed it the stop-and-a-half I normally push Gold @1600. Came out perfectly well, so I have a new exposure and development scheme

jharr · « **Reply #25 on:** April 08, 2017, 08:59:39 PM »

Quote from: Klaus on April 08, 2017, 06:47:12 PM

My last scan of the weekend - going travelling for work ....
Couple of daffodil pictures, not very sharp (due to constant brise), taken with Bronica ETRsi, handheld, on Kodak Ektar 100, plus one fence post. Interesting effect on the first one, taken against the tarmac of the road, created an interesting blue colour - tarmac is of course mid to dark grey. As comparison a shot against green grass. Fence post was just to fill the last frame, interesting texture, just a bit of darkening of the highlights.

Nice job on the flowers Klaus. My guess on the first shot is that the color shift is from the scanner. If it was set on some sort of 'auto color' setting, it went looking for the brightest set of pixels it could find. If those pixels happened to be oh, say pale yellow, the scanner would "correct" that to white and shift everything toward blue. Just a guess based on my own 'auto' setting experience.

Klaus · « **Reply #26 on:** April 08, 2017, 09:09:40 PM »

I saw the colour, liked it and didn't bother play with the settings, so it was auto.

MiguelCampano · « **Reply #27 on:** April 09, 2017, 03:23:42 PM »

Hey Klaus, nice job with the flowers! I have two rolls of Ektar that need to be developed, I'll probably send them to the lab this week and see what comes out of it!

Here's a couple more from my weekly 8-mile ruck march at the local state park. Shot with Kodak Tri-X 400 at box speed and developed with Ilfosol 3 1:14 for 10 minutes... Or close to it.

Tire by Miguel Campano, on Flickr

Fence by Miguel Campano, on Flickr

I'm going to try a couple of rolls using the exposure bracket and set it at EV -1 and see if I can correct the highlight situation a little bit.

Late Developer · « **Reply #28 on:** April 09, 2017, 04:08:55 PM »

Great thread. Peter's photos of Westminster bridge are superb. I thought IrvB was taking the mickey by referring to Carlisle 'cos I've been there a fair few times and it don't look like that...! Then I realised it was Barbados....

Mine is a grab shot I spotted when I was having a sort through my hard drive. Taken in Cambridge a few years ago. Leica M6 with 50mm Summicron on Ilford XP2 Super. The dog's owner had just nipped into a shop, so no animal cruelty (the dog was only left for a couple of minutes)

imagesfrugales · « **Reply #29 on:** April 09, 2017, 05:11:28 PM »

New baby, the Voigtländer Vito C. It was made in Germany during the 80s by Balda, who also made the shell of the Minox 35.
Healthy 160 g with film, strap and batteries. Auto exposure 10 - 1/500, 2.8 - 16. Metering with 2 CDS-cells from 25 - 800 ASA, distance symbols and long exp. warning shown in viewfinder. Pros vs the Minox: better (bigger) viewfinder, finally a reliable shutter (yeah!), 2 simple LR44 batteries.

Portraied with Minolta X-370 and 2.8/24 Vivitar on Polypan F, deved in Caffenol-C-M (rs)

Voigtländer Vito C by Imagesfrugales, on Flickr

02Pilot · « **Reply #30 on:** April 10, 2017, 01:49:14 AM »

Thanks Bryan and Fluminian.

jharr · « **Reply #31 on:** April 10, 2017, 08:33:42 PM »

Quote from: imagesfrugales on April 09, 2017, 05:11:28 PM

New baby, the Voigtländer Vito C. It was made in Germany during the 80s by Balda, who also made the shell of the Minox 35.
Healthy 160 g with film, strap and batteries. Auto exposure 10 - 1/500, 2.8 - 16. Metering with 2 CDS-cells from 25 - 800 ASA, distance symbols and long exp. warning shown in viewfinder. Pros vs the Minox: better (bigger) viewfinder, finally a reliable shutter (yeah!), 2 simple LR44 batteries.

Is that Color Skopar the same formula as the Voigtländer, or just a label for some Balda lens?

Francois · « **Reply #32 on:** April 10, 2017, 09:20:14 PM »

The climate has really gone bunkers!
First day of the season where the temperature is over 20°C... in April.
So, I couldn't resist putting clothes on the line.

imagesfrugales · « **Reply #33 on:** April 10, 2017, 09:56:43 PM »

Quote from: jharr on April 10, 2017, 08:33:42 PM

Is that Color Skopar the same formula as the Voigtländer, or just a label for some Balda lens?

After Voigländer was owned by Rollei until 1982 and the insolveny of Rollei, Voigtländer was now owned by Plusfoto, not a producer but distributor. The lens is most probably not the great quasi apochomatic Color-scopar design but a Balda make. Voigtländer as a producer was dead. Balda sells the same camera with only minor design changes as Balda CA 35 with a 2.8/38 Baldanon lens which is supposed to be the same lens as in the Voigtländer. Nevertheless it seems to be a nice lens. First own results are about to come.

jojonas~ · « **Reply #34 on:** April 11, 2017, 08:37:11 AM »

Quote from: imagesfrugales on April 10, 2017, 09:56:43 PM

Quote from: jharr on April 10, 2017, 08:33:42 PM
Is that Color Skopar the same formula as the Voigtländer, or just a label for some Balda lens?
After Voigländer was owned by Rollei until 1982 and the insolveny of Rollei, Voigtländer was now owned by Plusfoto, not a producer but distributor. The lens is most probably not the great quasi apochomatic Color-scopar design but a Balda make. Voigtländer as a producer was dead. Balda sells the same camera with only minor design changes as Balda CA 35 with a 2.8/38 Baldanon lens which is supposed to be the same lens as in the Voigtländer. Nevertheless it seems to be a nice lens. First own results are about to come.

I've heard that they're more reliable. but how do the shutter actually differ?

ohyeah, as this is a weekend thread uh... here's two shots I took also

Bronica C loaded with good old Fortepan 100

imagesfrugales · « **Reply #35 on:** April 11, 2017, 11:47:18 AM »

Quote from: jojonas~ on April 11, 2017, 08:37:11 AM

I've heard that they're more reliable. but how do the shutter actually differ?

Weekend is over, so hopefully nobody blames us for some more ot.

The Minox 35 and Voigtländer Vito C or CS are different cameras, but designed by the same engineers who constructed the Minox 35 some years before and left the company to go to Balda . The "only" thing they have in common is a very similar casing, which was also made for Minox by Balda. So the shutter of the Vito C is a Balda construction. I don`t know the tech details. I had 5 broken Minox 35 in hands, not a single working, and the repair fix never worked for me to. The first Vito C now in my hands with signs of heavy use works perfect.

Remember there was a "real" Vito C about 20 years before these nice little plastic machines. I have a beautiful Vito CLR in full working condition with the legendary original Color-Scopar. Great lens - other story .... But the lens of the plastic Vito C is also quite nice, I will upload a sample this evening.

Author Topic: And now, it's the Weekend Thread! - 7-9 Apr 2017 (Read 11173 times)

Gimenosaiz