Author Topic: Using a digicam for exposure examples  (Read 843 times)

choppert

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 744
  • ChopperT
Using a digicam for exposure examples
« on: March 24, 2012, 09:36:39 PM »
Guys,

Probably a simple one.  I want to do a few more long exposures and thought I'd use the digicam to test exposure times.

I exposed at ISO 3,200 for 30 seconds at f4.0 (an EV of -1?)

If I then want to work out the correct exposure (by fiddling with my light meter) for f22 at ISO 400 I think I get to 2 hours - before any reciprocity compensation? I think I also get to 4 minutes at f4.0?

Have I done that right?

Any rules of thumb for film reciprocity failure?  If I were to use my two hour exposure would I need to increase it to four or six hours?

Thanks,


Chops
« Last Edit: March 24, 2012, 09:39:12 PM by choppert »
"Photography is about failure" - Garry Winogrand

Sandeha Lynch

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,669
    • Visual Records
Re: Using a digicam for exposure examples
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2012, 10:19:59 PM »
Every film is different, so this may help, a handy guide in seconds from somewhere in cyberspace.



You'll see that the newer bw emulsions need less extra time than the older classics.  IIRC, some colour negs go way off almost immediately and need filter correction, while (I think) Provia has virtually no rf at all.

byron

  • 35mm
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: Using a digicam for exposure examples
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2012, 12:03:44 PM »
while (I think) Provia has virtually no rf at all.
That's correct, and it's one of the reasons I shoot provia so much. No reciprocity failure up to 2 minutes, and minimal correction time (1/3 of a stop) after that.

Also, ChopperT, your math seems fine to me!
« Last Edit: March 25, 2012, 12:05:19 PM by byron »