Author Topic: Interesting Camera Nr. 35 - Fujita 66. (Read 14661 times)

Skorj · « **on:** December 30, 2009, 10:34:51 AM »

A snappy little buroni (6x6) SLR me thinks. I wonder if there is a wide lens?

Looks like something Sean has... See ya! Skj.

Skorj · « **Reply #1 on:** December 30, 2009, 10:37:32 AM »

Same format, different maker, the Kalimar Reflex:

Both f3,5 and 80mm, with near identical body construction... Skj.

moominsean · « **Reply #2 on:** December 30, 2009, 01:01:00 PM »

yeah i've been wanting one of these for awhile. i think there are a few other names, as well. Soligor 66 and Fodor 66 being two. i researched them last summer.

kuru · « **Reply #3 on:** December 30, 2009, 01:40:13 PM »

I've got two Kalimars, one working and one that the shutter curtain rods broke. Definitely an eccentric camera, the mirror likes to stick in my working one.

moominsean · « **Reply #4 on:** December 30, 2009, 10:58:03 PM »

plenty of lenses...and some variations!

[Sorry, image deleted during forum software upgrade. Please re-upload if so inclined.]

Skorj · « **Reply #5 on:** December 31, 2009, 12:54:13 AM »

I love that industrial gray finish... Nice!

jojonas~ · « **Reply #6 on:** October 01, 2010, 02:29:39 PM »

here we are, that fujita looks tip-tip!

I might have to put up a shot of my busted up one for reference. haha

moominsean · « **Reply #7 on:** October 01, 2010, 02:44:33 PM »

argh! now i want one again! will have to find the lost picture i posted previously.

jojonas~ · « **Reply #8 on:** October 01, 2010, 03:27:10 PM »

it wasn't from rick oleson's site, was it?

Quote from: moominsean on October 01, 2010, 02:44:33 PM

argh! now i want one again! will have to find the lost picture i posted previously.

it wasn't from rick oleson's site, was it?

(komaflex!!! phew.. finally remembered the name of the 127 version. s'been tip o the tounge haha~)

Skorj · « **Reply #9 on:** October 01, 2010, 03:39:04 PM »

Quote from: jojonas on October 01, 2010, 02:29:39 PM

I might have to put up a shot of my busted up one for reference. haha

Please do...

Mojave · « **Reply #10 on:** October 02, 2010, 03:16:08 PM »

What size film do they shoot? Sorry if thats a stupid question. Im guessing 120 but dont know for sure.

LT · « **Reply #11 on:** October 02, 2010, 03:34:04 PM »

Erin - 6x6 = 12 frames on 120/ 24 frames on 220

Francois · « **Reply #12 on:** October 02, 2010, 06:43:13 PM »

Quote from: leon taylor on October 02, 2010, 03:34:04 PM

Erin - 6x6 = 12 frames on 120/ 24 frames on 220

But who still shoots 220 anyways? (you need a special back to use the stuff)

LT · « **Reply #13 on:** October 03, 2010, 09:56:39 AM »

Quote from: Francois on October 02, 2010, 06:43:13 PM

But who still shoots 220 anyways? (you need a special back to use the stuff)

you'd be surprised Francois - and many cameras are 120/220 compliant. Even the new MF rangefinder from the Fujifilm stables have 120/220 compatibility.

Francois · « **Reply #14 on:** October 03, 2010, 03:46:53 PM »

Though I must admit the 24 exposures are much more comfortable than only 12...
It's just that I never had a camera in which the 220 stuff can be used... and I read that many cameras that have a switch (particularly the Russian ones) to go from one to the other will permanently screw up the film spacing if you use them... don't know why but that's what I read years ago.

moominsean · « **Reply #15 on:** October 15, 2010, 02:52:40 AM »

this one just keeps coming back. spotted this while looking for something else. still do want!

moominsean · « **Reply #16 on:** October 15, 2010, 03:55:16 AM »

and this has a nice look about it...

moominsean · « **Reply #17 on:** October 15, 2010, 06:21:00 PM »

uno mas!

jojonas~ · « **Reply #18 on:** October 15, 2010, 11:42:15 PM »

ooh~ that six sixty does have a certain look to it.

here's mine, as promised:

Skorj · « **Reply #19 on:** October 16, 2010, 05:24:15 AM »

Nice, viable, 6x6 device I think still. Skj.

Ed Wenn · « **Reply #20 on:** October 20, 2010, 09:51:20 PM »

For UK camera fans, Corfield made a 6x6 in this style too...albeit only briefly. Would love to own one of them from the historical perspective.

Photos courtesy of http://www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk/Museum/CorfieldCameras/page6.htm

jojonas~ · « **Reply #21 on:** October 21, 2010, 02:06:05 PM »

a bit different in design but the same feel for sure, ed.

but... is that a tripod mount on the side??

Suzi Livingstone · « **Reply #22 on:** October 21, 2010, 02:13:08 PM »

I want one!

moominsean · « **Reply #23 on:** October 21, 2010, 07:26:31 PM »

yeah i was reading about the corfield 66. guess they didn't make very many so it's somewhat rare. though priced is similar to the others.