Author Topic: Stand development  (Read 1329 times)

choppert

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 744
  • ChopperT
Stand development
« on: September 12, 2009, 09:27:50 PM »
Hello,

Just had a week near the Brecon Beacons and have developed a roll this eveing.

FP4+ in 1:127 HC110 and let it stand for about 40 minutes (with just 30 seconds of jiggling at the start)

Can anyone tell me what I should be looking for in a stood (?) developed film?

Does standing have advantages (yes, yes I know it makes you taller than sitting down!  ;D )?  Is it for pushed or pulled film?  Does it increase or decrease grain or contrast?

Half of me thinks I should have asked this before dunking a roll!

Thanks in advance,



Chops

PS Took some snaps of the waterfalls near Aber - stunning!  Anyone know it?
"Photography is about failure" - Garry Winogrand

choppert

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 744
  • ChopperT
Re: Stand development
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2009, 09:39:46 PM »
CORRECTION!

Abercynafon. 
Not Aber!
"Photography is about failure" - Garry Winogrand

LT

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,030
Re: Stand development
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2009, 12:26:25 AM »
've never used hc110 but stand dev is generally s'posed to offer better local contrast, increased edge sharpness without overall grain increase. Also, it has a compensatory effect allowing shadow detail to maximise whilst curtailing development in the dense highlight areas, so sort-for speed increasing. I'm all for a bit of stood negs me.   
L.

choppert

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 744
  • ChopperT
Re: Stand development
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2009, 06:41:32 PM »
Do I need to extend the development time?

In my weak dilution of 1:127 I let it stand for four times longer than the four times stronger dilution.
But that is for agitation every minute, shouldn't I extend the time if I'm not agitating it?

Thanks,



Chops
"Photography is about failure" - Garry Winogrand

LT

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,030
Re: Stand development
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2009, 06:48:26 PM »

But that is for agitation every minute, shouldn't I extend the time if I'm not agitating it?


yes - but deciding for how long will take a bit of testing.
L.

choppert

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 744
  • ChopperT
Re: Stand development
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2009, 08:11:59 PM »
One more twitty question...

You know the black thing that goes up the inside of a plastic spiral when you are about to process a film?

Well if you forget to load it and process a film with the white spiral visible down the hole in the middle of the tank, would you expect light to get in and bugger-up the first five frames and fog the top and bottom of the film?

Through careful experiment; I would!!!!   >:(  Doh!

Chops
"Photography is about failure" - Garry Winogrand

CarlRadford

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 588
    • Carls Gallery
Re: Stand development
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2009, 12:11:49 PM »
One more twitty question...

You know the black thing that goes up the inside of a plastic spiral when you are about to process a film?

Well if you forget to load it and process a film with the white spiral visible down the hole in the middle of the tank, would you expect light to get in and bugger-up the first five frames and fog the top and bottom of the film?

Through careful experiment; I would!!!!   >:(  Doh!

Chops

Yeap - fraid so - the black tube is what makes the tank light tight - depending on the light conditions and how long it was exposed to the light will determine the amount of fogging!