« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Pull processing???  (Read 1139 times)

choppert

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 744
  • ChopperT
Pull processing???
« on: December 06, 2010, 08:05:20 PM »
Righty ho,

My understanding is that if I expose a roll of 1600 film as 800 ISO and then develop as if it were an 800 film then I've pull processed the film.

Have I got it right so far?

Right - so when I see on the web people saying "I prefer rating the 1600 at 1000"

I take it that this person still develops the film as if it were still a 1600 film?
Presumably they are just overexposing by 2/3 of a stop to bring out some of the shadow detail?

Am I on the right lines?

Chops
Logged
"Photography is about failure" - Garry Winogrand

Pete_R

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,149
    • Contax 139 Resource
Re: Pull processing???
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2010, 08:34:23 PM »
Yep!
Logged
"I've been loading films into spirals for so many years I can almost do it with my eyes shut."

Alan

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,142
Re: Pull processing???
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2010, 08:35:30 PM »
Im using Fuji Acros100 a lot now as it doesnt suffer from Reciprocity Failure

I pull [over-expose] the film mostly 2 stops so I shoot it at ISO25
and compensate for the "incorrect" exposure when developing by
40%.

I use Caffenol-C normally @ 15 minutes so while pull processing I dev for 9 minutes.

You probably heard the phrase "Expose for the shadows and develop for the Highlights"

to answer your question >


Right - so when I see on the web people saying "I prefer rating the 1600 at 1000"

I take it that this person still develops the film as if it were still a 1600 film?
Presumably they are just overexposing by 2/3 of a stop to bring out some of the shadow detail?

dont know  ;D
Logged

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,762
Re: Pull processing???
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2010, 09:35:54 PM »
Overexposing should bring more details to the shadows. If I really want shadow detail, I meter the shadow detail... so I guess that is really doing the same thing.
Logged
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

Ken B: eyes, I just do eyes.

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 491
  • In email, no one can hear you scream
Re: Pull processing???
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2010, 10:24:37 PM »
Quote from: Francois on December 06, 2010, 09:35:54 PM
Overexposing should bring more details to the shadows. If I really want shadow detail, I meter the shadow detail... so I guess that is really doing the same thing.

eggzachary
Logged
Age can weary me when it can keep the hell up

http://www.kensphotoblog2013.com/

http://www.artybollocks.com/

Ed Wenn

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,300
  • Slowly getting back into it. Sometimes.
Re: Pull processing???
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2010, 12:31:19 AM »
I would totally understand this thread if I hadn't had that 2nd glass of apple vodka right after the bottle of Weston's cider I drank with my tea. Hic.

 :)

Logged

original_ann

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,276
Re: Pull processing???
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2010, 01:35:23 AM »
How many fingers am I holding up right now, Ed?   :D
Logged

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,762
Re: Pull processing???
« Reply #7 on: December 07, 2010, 05:08:33 PM »
Well, Weston's cider might not be so bad... proof is Edward Weston, Weston meters, Weston Bread........  :P
Logged
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

Phil Bebbington

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,568
    • Phil Bebbington
Re: Pull processing???
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2010, 03:46:17 PM »
And let's not forget, Weston (Super Mare)  ;D http://weston-super-mare.com/
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »