I've become interested in the work of Winston Duke:
Example 1Example 2Example 3WebsiteParticularly, I'm interested in how he's lighting these portraits. I realize they're all different. I'm trying to tease out the individual effects, but I'm struggling; there isn't much info about these photos, and of course the catchlights aren't particularly helpful.
What I know: He was (is?) part of a photo collective called "Stealing Frames." It seems they would gather in a blacked-out studio, and build their lighting setup from the ground up without a lot of traditional modifiers and with a lot of non-traditional ones. For example, I have seen fiber optic light cables in frame in some of his work, although I'm not sure they were used in any of these examples. Their work is in-camera; none of this is digital manipulation. It also appears that some of the effects are from manipulation of the negative, although I'll admit to being less interested in that aspect and more interested in the lighting itself.
Some of my suspicions: Some of these may be shot on large format film and then cropped way in (they seem somewhat grainy)? There are prisms involved? The exposures are rather long?
What I'm really curious about: How is the diamond so perfectly framed in example 1? Same for the circle in example 3? How is that white flame-like effect encircling the model in example 2 achieved? Are the models just holding reeeeeally still, or are the exposures shorter than I thought (or are there multiple exposures here?) Curious to hear any and all speculation.