Author Topic: Master of Photography  (Read 1309 times)

Late Developer

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,033
    • My Website
Master of Photography
« on: July 22, 2016, 08:51:10 AM »
Just a quick heads up....

Sky Arts has just started showing their 8 part competition to find the European "Master of Photography" - who will win Euros 150,000, an exhibition, etc. 

I'm hoping there'll be a "film" element to it but, nevertheless, if you're into photography, it looks interesting.

Last night's challenge was to show the beauty of Rome (which I thought would be like shooting fish in a barrel but it didn't quite work out that way).
« Last Edit: July 22, 2016, 08:54:31 AM by Late Developer »
"An ounce of perception. A pound of obscure".

Mike (happyforest)

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 566
Re: Master of Photography
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2016, 08:57:05 PM »
Based on last nights programme,

Camera's provided by the program makers/sponsors, and I didn't see a film based option and
6 hours to take images, followed by post processing, next day(?). I doubt if there is a film option. With one image to be submitted for judging.

Although I think a film image would add an interesting element.

Whilst they were post processing Alex Web a photographer with a reputation for street photographer, wandered amongst them commenting on their images.

The photographers were chosen based on a portfolio of images submitted for consideration, and it made for an unusual diversity of the photographers. Professional, amateur and differing styles. I believe that one of the photographers portfolio consisted of mainly self portraits and another abandoned buildings. So how they made the selection of the contestants is a mystery.

It was interesting that despite the task being to produce a photo that showed the beauty of Rome, that some of them seemed to inject their style onto Rome, which in my mind seemed to be wrong.

For example.

The photographer who was into self portraits, took what I thought was a relatively ordinary photo of a fountain except she injected herself into the scene by sitting on the edge.

I also think it was unfair to eliminate a contestant in this programme.  The judges commented that they felt the photographers were trying to make an image that would please them, and they should have been constrained by this.

When presenting their final images, I think we did not get an opportunity to review them for long enough. I found it frustrating that initially they were shown with a misty effect and then we were shown a clearer image, but for too short a time.

Having said all this, I will watch the next episode and finally, I didn't try and enter. Who am I to really judge.

Mike


« Last Edit: July 23, 2016, 09:16:57 AM by Mike (happyforest) »

Late Developer

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,033
    • My Website
Re: Master of Photography
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2016, 12:19:18 AM »
The judges are:

Oliviero Toscani
Rut Blees Luxemburg
Simon Frederick

I've heard of them all but can't say I've seen anything by any of them other than Mr Toscani. Looks like Bruce Gilden will be making an appearance in coming weeks.  That should be fun.

The camera sponsor is Leica and, although last night was 100% non-film, I'm hoping that with Leica's history, there may be a film component to the overall competition.  At the end of the day, it's a talent show and there will be eliminations each week.  I didn't agree with the "winner" last night but I wasn't too upset to see the back of the photographer who was eliminated.  Nothing against her, personally, but her photos did nothing for me.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2016, 12:21:06 AM by Late Developer »
"An ounce of perception. A pound of obscure".

Late Developer

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,033
    • My Website
Re: Master of Photography
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2016, 08:43:13 AM »
Episode 2 is shooting 3 night photos in Berlin and the expert judge is Bruce Gilden.
"An ounce of perception. A pound of obscure".