Author Topic: Photo London 2016 rant  (Read 942 times)

zapsnaps

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 730
  • Get Zapped!
    • http://www.NowSeeThis.co.uk
Photo London 2016 rant
« on: May 20, 2016, 04:34:09 PM »
Is Somerset House the worst possible exhibition space for a 'major' photography exhibition? Numerous small rooms, crowded, camped corridors (even mid-week when people should have been at work, cough). Stupid separate sections of the building, glass fibre pavilions, annex and mezzanine so you are constantly handing your ticket to be endlessly scanned by a single person at each entrance (the other person there is 'security'. Why they can't hold a scanner too is quite beyond me). So, the building is not fit for purpose.

What about the exhibits? Disappointing, too, to be frank. If you are starting out, it will be fantastic see all the usual suspects, perhaps for the first time in the flesh. But to a seasoned photo fair goer, it was a bit of a yawn. Multiple copies of the same snap, offered by different galleries, occasionally in almost adjacent rooms left me feeling distinctly underwhelmed. There were few photographers there I didn't recognise. Those I did recognise were represented by prints which will familiar to anyone who has ever glanced at a 'best of' book.

All bad, then? No. Hamiltons (who didn't exhibit last year) had an exceptional exhibition space. And if you like early work, Robert Hershkowitz had (his usual) exemplary offering. But other than that? Not much sticks out. Apart from the Rankin instant photo booth, the RANKOMAT. It's in the annex if you'd like to indulge yourself. Which I did. Rather extensively. It's free & fun.

I went to inaugural event last year and didn't like it. I put it down to not being 'in the mood'. This year only confirmed my grudge against the building and the unimaginative offerings. London deserves better. And so does the paying public at a punchy ticket price of £25 plus 'fees' of £2 and a further £1 for the privilege of me printing my own ticket on my own printer at home.

As you may have gathered by now, I think I'll give Photo London 2017 a miss. And judging by the comments from some of the dealers and and the lack of business being done (despite the crowds), so may some of the dealers.
Nudes make the world go round
www.NowSeeThis.co.uk

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,768
Re: Photo London 2016 rant
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2016, 09:12:25 PM »
Why they can't hold a scanner too is quite beyond me
I have only one word for that: Unionized workers convention contract.

In a sense you're still lucky in a way. Here in Montreal we have no dedicated exhibit space or even event for photography apart for Le mois de la photo which happens every two years.
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

Late Developer

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,033
    • My Website
Re: Photo London 2016 rant
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2016, 06:18:09 PM »
David, I haven't been to this exhibition but I have been to the Sony "World" event there a couple of times but I have to agree that it's definitely not the best space for a show.  It's convenient to get to and it's an impressive building but the thing that put me right off was the price for entry and the cost of attending the talks.  I know it won't be cheap to get top pros there for 4 days but I couldn't justify the time off work or the cost.
"An ounce of perception. A pound of obscure".