Author Topic: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...  (Read 3331 times)

Thom Stone

  • Peel Apart
  • ***
  • Posts: 398
    • With The Cold
oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« on: September 10, 2012, 03:55:23 PM »
ok, as some of you may  well know, I love polaroid, especially my SX-70. I therefore love the impossible project for keeping my wonderful folding beauty alive...

If you know me even better you may know that I have... what you could call... a slight aversion to apple.... I'm really not a huge fan, I think their products are over priced fashion accessories that people get FAR too excited about and attatched to.... (oh the irony I hear you all cry)

ah well, this is Impossibles latest "exciting announcement" personally I couldn't be more dissapointed... verging on disgusted.

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/impossible/impossible-instant-lab-turn-iphone-images-into-rea


Discuss....

Paul Mitchell

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,023
  • Heaven is PanF at f138
    • Paul Mitchell Photography
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2012, 04:13:18 PM »
It's just an updated Daylab printer thats all... more hipster fodder. They do say that if there's enough interest they'll make cradles for Android phone's too.
When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.

Thom Stone

  • Peel Apart
  • ***
  • Posts: 398
    • With The Cold
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2012, 04:17:00 PM »
yeah, i can understand why they would do it, essentially to try and get more hipster interest... just think they would be much better off spending the time and the money on making a camera, which they have mentioned in the past. just cant understand why this would take priority over a new camera. it also seems kind of pointless turning digital photos taken on a phone into a polaroid.

sapata

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,079
  • "I want to be plastic" Andy Warhol
    • Personal Site
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2012, 04:45:10 PM »
It is another daylab as Paul mentioned and fair to say much better thatn that zinc printer Polaroid released few time ago.

Through the promotional video you can see is that clearly marketed to the younger mobile phone photographers generation, it's far to say that some youngsters never had a camera before in their lives apart form the ones on their mobile phone. Florian is a marketing expert and his targeting another group of people to buy their film...

What I don't get is why they need people's money for doing this?

Don't want to start another thread in here but it's been almost a year since I've been using my iMac and I cringe everytime I have to use my wife's Windows laptop >:(
« Last Edit: September 10, 2012, 05:28:31 PM by sapata »
Mauricio Sapata
@mauriciosapata
mauriciosapata.com

hookstrapped

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,289
    • Peter Brian Schafer PHOTOGRAPHY
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2012, 06:54:27 PM »
Hipsterism is all about being ironic, so yeah.

jojonas~

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,928
  • back at 63° 49′ 32″ N
    • jojonas @ flickr
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2012, 08:01:44 PM »
I find this page much more interesting: http://www.the-impossible-project.com/projects/camera/fpu

make a new camera instead? this is one step on the way~ atleast that's what I think when I read "modular platform".
check the links on the bottom right of that page; "pinhole camera" "viewfinder camera"?? I'm thinking photokina will be interesting ;D
/jonas

Chalky

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 663
    • Instant surf
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2012, 08:17:30 PM »
yeah when I first saw this I was dissapointed as I am not an iPhone user and not so keen on the idea of 'instantising' digital photos...

which I guess is relatively hipocritical as I digitise all my instant pics.

anyway... the email they sent about the impossible camera says that the processing unit which is the base of this, is designed so it can be used with other cameras, quote:

"The FPU will serve as the basis for a range of new analog instant gear to be introduced in 2013"

so, I'm just watching this space for the time being...

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,740
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2012, 09:29:48 PM »
Just imagine: analog pixels ;)

Actually, in the old Apple ][ days, people would do the color separation on the computer and photograph the screen three times through different filters to get a color image... same thing, just a smaller computer.
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

Thom Stone

  • Peel Apart
  • ***
  • Posts: 398
    • With The Cold
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2012, 11:30:54 PM »
I did post this before getting the email update about the camera.... I will let the hipsters have there fun now. :-P

gothamtomato

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,147
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2012, 11:28:57 AM »
I ordered one. Does this make me a hipster?

Actually, what this seems like to me is just a great marketing idea; a way to have enough pre-orders in your pocket before you manufacture the item. I saw this when they announced it on Twitter yesterday and watched the 'pledges' tick up all day. They're now at $197,000. I wish I could come up with a kickstarter project that raised $197,000 in a day!

I still have a bunch of real Polaroid SX-70 in my fridge and I figure I'll be able to use it to make manipulated SX-70 px from my iPhone.

Late Developer

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,033
    • My Website
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2012, 12:55:47 PM »
All this reminded me of a photo I saw years ago entitled "blonde copying a Word document"  ;)

I think that the iP daylab is probably right up there at the top of the list of items I'm least likely to buy - ever.

The only benefit for TiP film users is that if the Hipsterati cause an increase in use of film, that might help reduce the cost of the film and, perhaps, fund further R&D into producing new films that are stable and permanent.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2012, 01:00:38 PM by Late Developer »
"An ounce of perception. A pound of obscure".

Alan

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,142
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2012, 05:21:26 PM »

The only benefit for TiP film users is that if the Hipsterati cause an increase in use of film, that might help reduce the cost of the film and, perhaps, fund further R&D into producing new films that are stable and permanent.

yup i agree.

impossible are just trying to expand the useage of the product.


jojonas~

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,928
  • back at 63° 49′ 32″ N
    • jojonas @ flickr
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2012, 08:40:12 PM »
I found this possible jimmy rig interesting:

though I guess it would need some help in pushing the focus back that far.
/jonas

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,740
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2012, 09:14:56 PM »
There are three ways to do this from simple to complex.
-Take a picture of a groundglass.
-Add a series of lenses to move focus backwards.
-Use a series of prisms like in the old NPC Nikkor backs.
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

gary m

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 452
  • Listen to the picture
    • Gary Moyer
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #14 on: September 12, 2012, 12:09:37 AM »
I used to take a digi picture and upload it to my computer. I then used my SX70 camera loaded with Time Zero film and photograph the monitor. Kinda like a poormans Daylab. I then manipped the actual Polaroid print. Made all these doing that method, except the Coke can sample. http://www.filmwasters.com/guests/v/guestgallery45/

gary m

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 452
  • Listen to the picture
    • Gary Moyer
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #15 on: September 12, 2012, 12:13:18 AM »
Actually found an old video I made of the process years ago. http://youtu.be/WwF4tiyZq2U

Dave Dunne

  • 120
  • **
  • Posts: 83
  • I post here to see what posting here looks like
    • Connect
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2012, 02:47:28 AM »
I used to take a digi picture and upload it to my computer. I then used my SX70 camera loaded with Time Zero film and photograph the monitor. Kinda like a poormans Daylab. I then manipped the actual Polaroid print. Made all these doing that method, except the Coke can sample. http://www.filmwasters.com/guests/v/guestgallery45/

Hmmm... now I am inspired. ;D

tani.P

  • 120
  • **
  • Posts: 121
    • Spaghetti Tree
Re: oh dear... impossible may have taken the cake this time...
« Reply #17 on: September 12, 2012, 03:11:47 AM »
This whole things seems like maybe it should have been an attachment for existing cameras rather than a dedicated unit. My guess is they'll build off of this base to make a new camera eventually. I think I'll stick to my Sun 660 for the time being....