Topic: E6 processing in London

[Ken B: eyes, I just do eyes.]

Where do I take my 120 E6.

I work in near Baker St station

[sapata]

I normaly take to metro (www.metroimaging.com)

[Ed Wenn]

Ken, it's worth looking up your local Snappy Snaps and seeing whether they offer E6. Snappy Snaps is a franchise organisation and each franchise holder decides which services they wish to provide. The branch on Wardour St for instance has long been a pro lab in all but name and many of the West End branches offer services like E6 which you might not suspect they would.

[Ken B: eyes, I just do eyes.]

thanks guys

[Miles]

So agreed it's not quite London (at all) but I just sent my first rolls of E6 (120 expired Kodak) to these peops;

http://www.thephotoshoponline.co.uk/

And the were really helpful, even sent in a roll of expired efke 127 and asked for the backing paper and reel back so that I could try rolling 35mm into the Baby Yash and they were dandy about it all and gave me a 15% discount.

120 film with 6x6 border prints + C/D is ?12.95 per film (same for the 127)

I was jolly pleased with the results, some from the Ensign, other the Toyocaflex.

[Miles]

Ed Man, what's happened to my new pics 

 

[edthened]

Ed Man, what's happened to my new pics 

 

Och a wood sae rat ther awfie abstract       

[Phil Bebbington]

wow - existentialist photos!

Or perhaps I have had just one gin to many!

[Miles]

Eeererrrr, yeah that was actually the effect I was striving for.

Thanks all.

 

[Francois]

Lovely works of art.
You could submit them to the glitch art flickr group...
Actually, when printed big, it should be quite nice!

[Miles]

It's just one of the collaborations that Ed and I are leading on at the moment.  The Lomo boys are interested in syndication rights ...

[filmwast]

Yeah, we're having some issues with getting the old photos to re-appearing across the whole of the forum post the recent software upgrade. It's weird; they're all here, they just don't seem to be being recognised as valid JPGs by whatever part of this setup is responsible for putting the images on the page. I'll take a look at how the newer images (i.e. those posted after the upgrade and which look fine) appear at the back end (minus Derek's tool*) and compare that to how the older images look.

In the meantime, Miles you could just edit your original post and re-upload the images?

* God bless Mr Bowman, eh Miles?

[Miles]

Lordy, not "The" "God Bless" Mr. Boman ?

Holy Moly.  I always remeber Rob telling that "Derek's Special Tool did everything at the back end" and then relised that he saw nothing funny in the statement.