Author Topic: super fast lens  (Read 1791 times)

moominsean

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,173
  • Living in camera shadows.
    • moominstuff
super fast lens
« on: March 20, 2010, 05:42:09 AM »
"A world without Polaroid is a terrible place."
                                                                  - John Waters

Skorj

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,901
  • the black cat
    • Filmwasters.com
Re: super fast lens
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2010, 09:59:56 AM »

This-is-damion

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,349
    • Damion Rice
Re: super fast lens
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2010, 01:37:35 PM »
my mouth is open as that lens!

f0.95, f0.75....what...looks great!

What camera is that?    M8?    isnt that a digital leica?

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,769
Re: super fast lens
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2010, 02:29:42 PM »
Yep, M8 is a digital Leica... but who cares!
Just look at that gorgeous chunk of glass!

<Drooling over keyboard>

I don't know what kind of bokeh it gives but it still is something.

I know Mijonju put some surveillance camera lenses on a Digital Pen... But it still doesn't have the same charm.

I just calculated that a single element 50mm lens would just need to be 66mm diameter to have a f/stop of .75
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

This-is-damion

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,349
    • Damion Rice
Re: super fast lens
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2010, 02:39:53 PM »
Francois,   your never ending pool of knowledge and mathmatical ability never ceases to amaze.

Could you apply your maths calculations to  the following :-

http://www.paddypower.com/racing/daily-racing/lingfield/3%3A00-LISTED-%283YO%29-7f-1798283.html

If you could let me know first 2, that would be great!

 

Ed Wenn

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,300
  • Slowly getting back into it. Sometimes.
Re: super fast lens
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2010, 03:46:23 PM »
Now I may be making things up here, but wasn't there a super fast (i.e. sub f1,00) Leica lens (or something Leica-related) that Stanley Kubrik used to film scenes in Barry Lyndon? Maybe this was it? There were lots of fireside scenes in the movie and Kubrik wanted to shoot with no additional light, so a really fast lens was needed.

Ed Wenn

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,300
  • Slowly getting back into it. Sometimes.
Re: super fast lens
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2010, 03:48:40 PM »
OK, my bad. It was actually a f0,7 Zeiss lens that he used. Here's a link to the story and some photos of it: http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/sk/ac/len/page1.htm

edthened

  • Peel Apart
  • ***
  • Posts: 302
    • http://www.flickr.com/photos/edthened/
Re: super fast lens
« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2010, 05:31:48 PM »
Och dem lenses ar far tae fast f'r mee cos ad bee oota breath beefore a cood get it on ma camera, so ther    ::)   ::)   ;)   ;D
A Man's a Man for a' that
Robert Burns

sapata

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,079
  • "I want to be plastic" Andy Warhol
    • Personal Site
Re: super fast lens
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2010, 05:33:16 PM »


:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :
Mauricio Sapata
@mauriciosapata
mauriciosapata.com

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,769
Re: super fast lens
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2010, 09:16:30 PM »
There were lots of fireside scenes in the movie and Kubrik wanted to shoot with no additional light, so a really fast lens was needed.
But sadly I don't think he used the camera you see in the moon scene of 2001
I still wonder if it was a camera that was produced (underwater) or something straight out of the imagination...

[Sorry, image deleted during forum software upgrade. Please re-upload if so inclined.]
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

original_ann

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,276
Re: super fast lens
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2010, 01:33:40 AM »
Oh. My. Word.  I want to see photo results!