Filmwasters

Which Board? => Main Forum => Topic started by: sapata on October 03, 2012, 02:51:00 PM

Title: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: sapata on October 03, 2012, 02:51:00 PM: I wonder what would happen if this test was made with a 5D for example...

http://youtu.be/X8lWLEtC8wY (http://youtu.be/X8lWLEtC8wY)
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: Francois on October 03, 2012, 04:37:58 PM: What makes me laugh is the tone in his voice when he gives the final verdict!
He sounds so disappointed that the low end Rollei performed better!

But the lens used has a major effect on the results. If he used a zoom, then fuzz is to be expected. But for a prime lens, results would be better.

As for the diff between the Rollei and a top Canon... I suspect results would be pretty darn close.
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: Paul Mitchell on October 04, 2012, 10:52:15 AM: What the heck is 'pastelled'!?
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: Francois on October 04, 2012, 03:45:15 PM: pastelled=diluted colors due to the linear nature of sensors. Also caused by antialiasing filters and lack of precise focus which reduce contrast.
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: Late Developer on October 04, 2012, 04:31:31 PM: That's the problem with digital imagery; always something complex going on when you'd expect lack of focus to just cause plain old "blur".
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: Paul Mitchell on October 04, 2012, 05:12:07 PM: Quote from: Francois on October 04, 2012, 03:45:15 PM
pastelled=diluted colors due to the linear nature of sensors. Also caused by antialiasing filters and lack of precise focus which reduce contrast.

Nothing to do with chewy, sugar coated sweets then?...
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: LT on October 04, 2012, 06:06:11 PM: Quote from: Paul Mitchell on October 04, 2012, 05:12:07 PM
Quote from: Francois on October 04, 2012, 03:45:15 PM
pastelled=diluted colors due to the linear nature of sensors. Also caused by antialiasing filters and lack of precise focus which reduce contrast.

Nothing to do with chewy, sugar coated sweets then?...

I'm thinking Rinstead.
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: Ed Wenn on October 04, 2012, 10:19:00 PM: Boo ya! "The trees have all gone to pastel". That may become my new catchphrase ;)
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: LT on October 05, 2012, 07:28:15 AM: Quote from: Ed Wenn on October 04, 2012, 10:19:00 PM
"The trees have all gone to pastel".

I'm thinking the Optician would diagnose cataracts.
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: sapata on October 05, 2012, 02:24:37 PM: The origin of pastel:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastel_%28food%29 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastel_%28food%29)

:P
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: LT on October 05, 2012, 03:55:51 PM: or:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastille (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastille)
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: LT on October 05, 2012, 03:57:24 PM: or:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasty (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasty)
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: sapata on October 05, 2012, 04:10:40 PM: Quote from: Leon on October 05, 2012, 03:57:24 PM
or:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasty (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasty)
Title: Re: Canon DSLR x Rolleicord
Post by: Paul Mitchell on October 06, 2012, 09:51:33 AM: I love it when threads descend into complete drivel ;D