Filmwasters
Which Board? => Main Forum => Topic started by: sapata on March 12, 2012, 12:51:14 AM
-
I do... but some people are not really worried about it :o
Stump Part III - Duck Cam (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8nYzdVRG7E#ws)
-
Bah!
"This video is private. Sorry about that."
-
Ed...I swear it was working when I posted... >:( anyways, here are few links ;)
http://www.martincheung.com/works/2000_duckcam/2000_duckcam.html (http://www.martincheung.com/works/2000_duckcam/2000_duckcam.html)
http://www.cnngo.com/hong-kong/play/martin-cheung-rebukes-automatic-cameras-loves-pinhole-photography-867272 (http://www.cnngo.com/hong-kong/play/martin-cheung-rebukes-automatic-cameras-loves-pinhole-photography-867272)
-
hmmm will probably be shot down for this - but I find this a bit sensationalistic for the sake of it -yes it will get views etc and is linked to use of film - but feel uncomfortable with the desecration of any animal; yes its eaten at the end -but trivialises the fact that it was a living being, I can see the 'novelty' aspect but...
Me - ex vegetarian and animal rights campaigner -so somewhat colored opinion from that perspective
-
I'm not really wanting to enter into the use of animals debate ... but I do think this is a bit of a waste of time either way. Just make a camera out of a box - why use a cooked duck carcass? seems like he's making life difficult for himself (and the duck!) for the sake of it.
interesting none-the-less.
-
I agree with that Leon... I also hate grease hands and I can't imagine the tripod's condition after the shooting.... arrgghh!
But maybe he was trying to prove which came first? the egg camera or the duck camera? ;D
http://www.filmwasters.com/forum/index.php?topic=4139.0 (http://www.filmwasters.com/forum/index.php?topic=4139.0)
-
...but I find this a bit sensationalistic for the sake of it...
...hang on. You're saying that there isn't a valid artistic reason for making a pinhole camera out of a cooked chicken? ;D ;D ;D
[5 minutes later]
Honestly, I've spent 5 minutes trying to think of some irnoic and hilarious comeback along the lines of, "Next you'll be saying that blah, blah, blah"...but I got sidetracked thinking of all of the other animals that the guy could have used if he'd had some proper cojones...and laughing like a drain. An elephant? A beluga whale? A unicorn? My favourite was a fully inflated puffer fish (see below).
(http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/media-live/photos/000/006/cache/pufferfish_673_600x450.jpg)
Image courtesy of National Geographic (http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/fish/pufferfish/)
-
Amazing Ed... The first ever underwater pinhole photograph is about to happen!
This thread is promising...
-
(http://images.nationalgeographic.com/wpf/media-live/photos/000/006/cache/pufferfish_673_600x450.jpg)
Image courtesy of National Geographic (http://animals.nationalgeographic.com/animals/fish/pufferfish/)
I'd rather see the unicorn?
-
Fugu anyone?
I heard it gives your picture a bit of an electric feel...
-
ok... i'm starting not finding this funny anymore :(
http://www.americanphotomag.com/photo-gallery/2012/03/turning-turtles-cameras-onorato-krebs (http://www.americanphotomag.com/photo-gallery/2012/03/turning-turtles-cameras-onorato-krebs)
-
I followed the duck cam link and to be honest, I think I've just wasted five minutes of my life.
-
ok... i'm starting not finding this funny anymore :(
http://www.americanphotomag.com/photo-gallery/2012/03/turning-turtles-cameras-onorato-krebs (http://www.americanphotomag.com/photo-gallery/2012/03/turning-turtles-cameras-onorato-krebs)
Poor turtle... :'(