Author Topic: Redscale?  (Read 4091 times)

Windy

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 459
  • aka Ian
    • my flickr
Redscale?
« on: November 15, 2011, 07:10:21 PM »
A first attempt at redscale. I used a roll of Kodak Gold 400 and rolled it (back to front) onto a 200 dx coded cassette so that the auto iso function on the Espio would overexpose. Some results


Redscale 1 by windy_, on Flickr


Redscale 4 by windy_, on Flickr


Redscale 5 by windy_, on Flickr


Redscale 7 by windy_, on Flickr
« Last Edit: November 19, 2011, 10:10:14 AM by Windy »

sapata

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,079
  • "I want to be plastic" Andy Warhol
    • Personal Site
Re: Redscale
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2011, 07:28:06 PM »
Great tones on 2nd and 3rd picture...
Mauricio Sapata
@mauriciosapata
mauriciosapata.com

hookstrapped

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,289
    • Peter Brian Schafer PHOTOGRAPHY
Re: Redscale
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2011, 07:31:13 PM »
Real nice tones.

Andrea.

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,370
    • Flickr
Re: Redscale
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2011, 09:56:33 PM »
Lovely colours. Reddish scale maybe ??

charles binns

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,134
    • Here and There
Re: Redscale
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2011, 10:01:56 PM »
Me likey number 4 (the bridge).  I bought a pack of 3 (Lomo redscales) on ebay recently and been dying to use them (the lomo redscales that is, not the pack of 3).

Looking at these makesd me want to get out and shoot.

astrobeck

  • Guest
Re: Redscale
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2011, 03:31:16 AM »
the light and color on the bridge is magical!

Nice stuff Mr. Windy!

Heather

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 599
    • Stargazy Photography
Re: Redscale
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2011, 09:02:16 AM »
Weird... I'm sure some magical digital things have stripped out the red in your photos? It doesn't look like redscale to me. Maybe a little bit on the first. Maybe it's not exposed as much as I remember doing for my redscale too, I think I shot mine at 100 and was 400, so a two stop change.
The compositions are lovely though :)
Heather
ooh shiny things!
http://www.stargazy.org/

LT

  • Global Moderator
  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,030
Re: Redscale
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2011, 09:12:13 AM »
I really like the subtle colour shift - much nicer than the usual sickly orangey red in red scale. It sort of looks x-processed.
L.

Phil Bebbington

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,568
    • Phil Bebbington
Re: Redscale
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2011, 10:51:15 AM »
I'm with Leon on this one. The subtle colour shift is far more pleasing in my opinion.

Soap

  • 120
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • Edge of the world
    • Noir
Re: Redscale
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2011, 11:39:53 PM »
Wow. Weird beautiful tones around. Ill try this someday  :)
35mm -  - Olympus OM10 - Nikon F3HP
-
120 - Minolta Autocord I
-
Photoblog
http://steveninn.tumblr.com/
500PX
http://500px.com/Steveninn

Windy

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 459
  • aka Ian
    • my flickr
Re: Redscale
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2011, 07:16:37 AM »
Thanks all for the comments.

Heather - I just scanned as I would with normal film, should I be making adjustments? I'll also try over-exposing more next time.

It's something I've wanted to have a go at for a while, I'll play some more and experiment (different exposures etc.). But, like 'colour popping' I do think it's something where occasional pictures can be effective, but it can soon become too much.

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,630
Re: Redscale
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2011, 11:36:48 PM »
I'm always a bit surprised when I see normal colors come out of a redscaled film!
I know scanners sometimes auto-correct colors without the user's consent...
Epson scan has in the configuration the possibility to constantly adjust exposure or use the ICM color management... it's in the configuration menu. That could be part of the issue.

I checked a book that describes how to do it... a rare thing!
It says the film should be overexposed by a whole 2 stops. The more you overexpose, the less dense the reds will be. Overexposure brings the image in the sepia and yellows territory.

There you have it...
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

Windy

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 459
  • aka Ian
    • my flickr
Re: Redscale?
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2011, 11:07:34 AM »
Think it may be an exposure thing. There are mixed results across the film with some shots looking more redscale than others. I Can't see an auto-correction on the scanner, it does a prescan and then you can open an exposure/colour correction programme after the pre-scan.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2011, 11:09:12 AM by Windy »

Andrea.

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,370
    • Flickr
Re: Redscale?
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2011, 11:49:42 AM »
I like them. Very nice colour however it happens! ;)

Francois

  • Self-Coat
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,630
Re: Redscale?
« Reply #14 on: November 20, 2011, 03:46:37 PM »
I Can't see an auto-correction on the scanner, it does a prescan and then you can open an exposure/colour correction programme after the pre-scan.
If the preview looks OK, the scan will be...
Francois

Film is the vinyl record of photography.

Windy

  • Sheet Film
  • ****
  • Posts: 459
  • aka Ian
    • my flickr
Re: Redscale?
« Reply #15 on: November 27, 2011, 07:25:05 AM »
Got a second roll of film back from developing yesterday and had similar results. So I started playing with the scanner. Seems (as some have mentioned here) that my result was due to scanner correction.  :-[

Found that I get a true redscale result by scanning the film as a positive image and then correcting digitally  :)